From: suzmccarth
Message: 2717
Date: 2004-07-02
> suzmccarth wrote:are
> >
> > --- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@...>
> > wrote:
> > > Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Perondi (molotro) wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> - there are only phonological and morphological
> > > > > >> elements and a syllabic/phonemic continuum.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I cannot see any "morphological elements" in English
> > spelling (apart
> > > > > > perhaps
> > > > > > word spacing and capital letters -- but these elements
> > certainlyused
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > unique to English).
> >
> > What is meant by the term morphophonemic? Does it not refer to
> > English? - site/sight to distinguish homophones or no/know. I
> > cannot agree that this is only historic because teens instant
> > messaging now use no/noe to disambiguate, a new non-historic
> > morphemic differentiation. What about the bound morpheme -ed
> > for /t/ or /@d/ or /d/. Isn't that a set spelling to representpast
> > tense. How was the term quasi-logographic intended earlier?neo-
> >
> > (Of course, I could not observe those who have Cherokee as their
> > first language of literacy. However, Tamil and Cree are called
> > syllabaries by the French. Maybe that term is descriptive.)interactions between
>
> Sorry, but where does "morphophonemic" come up in the thread you've
> quoted? It has nothing to do with orthography; it refers to
> phonology and morphology.>Not in the thread but liberally referred to in
> What do you mean by "bound morpheme"?bound versus free, or roots versus affix
>realized
> The morpheme {PAST} is realized in those three different ways after
> particular final sounds on verbs, parallel to the way {3SG} is
> in comparable environments.Yes but the morpheme {PAST} is not represented phonemically in
>Suzanne McCarthy
> Which "French" use the term "neosyllabary"?
> --
> Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...