From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 2148
Date: 2004-05-11
>Robert Hetzron, in an article he later disavowed, tried to show that
> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> > > Virama is certainly not a defining feature, IMHO, as even
> > > the Ethiopic script (after which the term "abugida" was
> > coined) has no virama (although you don't match the "schwa"
> > vowel series with a virama).
> >
> > Eh?
>
> Just a random thought. One of the Ethiopic vowels is nominally /@/ (schwa),
> but in most cases this vowel is not pronounced, so I thought it could be
> seen as the Ethiopic equivalent of virama.
>
> But, admittedly, it would be a strange kind of virama, as it sometimes has a
> vowel sound...