Nicholas Bodley wrote:

>
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:41:32 +0100, Marco Cimarosti
> <marco.cimarosti@...> wrote:
>
> > The only point where Unicode would be affected by these "chromatographic"
> > scripts is that, on The Unicode Standard book, the pages showing the code
> > chart for those scripts would be definitely better if printed in color.
>
> Being someone who has more than a passing interest in typography, I'm very
> impressed by the Unicode book and (especially) WWS. I suspect that there
> are interesting tales to tell about the production of WWS.

OUP hired a freelance designer, and I poured the text and tables into
her format. Where fonts weren't available through Ecological
Linguistics, I created them in Fontographer (and you can buy them from
Ecological Linguistics). The only difficulty was that my system -- a
IIci -- and printer -- whatever the current Apple laser printer model
was, 300 dpi -- stopped producing East Asian characters halfway through,
and they also didn't get into the PostScript files, so the proofs and
the final images for that section were done by another firm with
typesetting equipment that could handle it.
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...