From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 1832
Date: 2003-12-12
>And how are they able to communicate linguistically with them, or it, or
> At 09:02 -0500 2003-12-11, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> >Michael Everson wrote:
> >>
> >> At 08:39 -0500 2003-12-11, cowan@... wrote:
> >>
> >> >In addition, the status of Blissymbolics, Sutton Signwriting,and Braille
> >> >is debatable.
> >>
> >> Why? Blissymbolics are the *only* form of communication for some
> >> people.
> >
> >Name them.
>
> You want their personal names? I have personally
> met any number of non-speaking people, cerebral
> palsics mostly, who are unable to communicate
> linguistically with their friends, families, and
> carers without Blissymbolics.
> > >SignWriting is alive and kicking and gettingSo the structure of the organization has completely changed over the
> >more and more popular worldwide.
> >
> >??
>
> Nicaragua, Spain, Scandinavia, Germany, and
> elsewhere, if that's what your question marks
> were eliciting.
>
> >It's a cult.
>
> Nonsense. This comment is ignorant. SignWriting
> is being taught to children in schools, who are
> able to write their native languages with it.
> This incidentally turns out to make it much
> easier to teach the children a second language
> and literacy in it. Volume 2 of The Irish Deaf
> Community: The structure of Irish Sign Language,
> by Dónall P. Ó Baoill and Patrick A. Matthews,
> published by Institiuid Teangeolaíochta Éireann,
> contains a glossary of ISL with SignWriting
> orthography. This work also compares SignWriting
> with HamNoSys and Stokoe and favours SignWriting
> strongly.