My Unicode 3.0 book (I plan to update) is somewhat clumsy
to reach, so I didn't look up the Tibetan symbols referred to
in my previous message. Well, they are apparently not in
Unicode 3.0, if that matters.

I love the variety of Tibetan glyphs; they imply many
things I know nothing about, and many are fascinating
visually. The Unicode book is a treasure; having high-
quality glyphs from many places is a treat.

Nicholas Bodley |@| Waltham, Massachusetts