From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 1180
Date: 2003-01-23
>[I have lots and lots of messages awaiting me, so maybe someone's
> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> > John Cowan wrote:
> > >
> > > Peter T. Daniels scripsit:
> > >
> > > > > Returning to the Real World, is Yiddish orthography
> > still an abjad,
> > > > > or has it too become alphabetic?
> > > >
> > > > Why would you suggest that Yiddish isn't an alphabet?
> > >
> > > I was trying to probe whether these labels (alphabet,
> > abjad, etc.) refer
> > > to scripts or orthographies.
> >
> > Do explain how such a distinction would work (and how it applies to
> > Yiddish). Be sure to include definitions of those two terms as well as
> > of "writing system."
>
> While waiting for John's answer, I notice that distinguishing "scripts" from
> "orthographies" makes sense by an engineering point of view, such as when
> talking about designing typefaces or computer encodings.
>
> In *this* context, you can say that Hebrew and Yiddish use the same "script"
> (i.e., they share the same collection of signs, so you can design a typeface
> or encoding which works for both languages), although they have different
> "orthographic systems" (i.e., the Hebrew language uses all Hebrew letters to
> represent consonants, while Yiddish uses some of them for vowels).
> Of course, this distinction can be meaningless in other contexts, such asMaybe a better example is the Mac "Arabic" fonts, which accommodate
> the scientific study of writing systems.