Re: Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic

Michael Everson wrote:

> At 21:52 -0400 2002-07-04, John Cowan wrote:
> >The Unicode Standard (version 3.0, chapter 7) claims that Ogham and
> >Runic were still in non-revivalist use to the 16th and 19th centuries
> >respectively. Does anyone know where the evidence for these
> statements
> >was found?
>
> I do.

:-)

And would you be so kind to tell us where? (If the answer to this question
is "I would", please proceed directly with the reference).

_ Marco