Re: Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic

At 21:52 -0400 2002-07-04, John Cowan wrote:

>The Unicode Standard (version 3.0, chapter 7) claims that Ogham and
>Runic were still in non-revivalist use to the 16th and 19th centuries
>respectively. Does anyone know where the evidence for these statements
>was found?

I do.
--
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com