From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 570
Date: 2003-08-15
>14-08-03 04:47, Miguel Carrasquer wrote:I think Ladefoged & Maddieson's analysis is that Polish (and Mandarin) [s']
>
>> Ladefoged & Maddieson's thorough analysis of the s(h)ibilants reveals that
>> the following parameters can play a role:
>>
>> articulator:
>> 1 blade of the tongue (laminal)
>> 2 tip of the tongue (apical)
>> 3 underside of the tip of the tongue (sub-apical)
>
>And what about the anterior part of the dorsum?
>
>> place of articulation:
>> 1 the upper teeth (dental)
>> 2 the alevolar ridge (alveolar)
>> 3 behind the alveolar ridge (post-alveolar)
>> 4 the hard palate (palatal)
>
>One might also want to squeeze "prepalatal" between "postalveolar" and
>"palatal". Polish <s', z', c', dz'> are (antero-)dorso-prepalatal rather
>than lamino-postalveolar.
>> the shape of the tongue (blade/back):L & M list 10 types of sibilants:
>> 1 grooved \ dental,
>> 2 flat / alveolar
>> 3 domed \ post-alveolar,
>> 4 palatalized / (palatal)