Re: nasal *n, Re: Phonetic change lo -- no in some languages

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 371
Date: 2002-02-28

 
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrei Markine
To: phoNet@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:32 AM
Subject: [phoNet] nasal *n, Re: Phonetic change lo -- no in some languages

That is the expected regular reflex in Slavic is e~ < In- < *n. How are present forms ne-/ni- explained?
 
Secondary, from the isolation form of the negative particle (*ne) and its derivatives. Cf. English un- (inherited) and non- (innovated).
 
Piotr


Previous in thread: 370
Next in thread: 372
Previous message: 370
Next message: 372

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts