Dear Ven. Yuttadhammo,
It certainly looks like a mistake. There is an alt. 3rd person plural for causative verbs, but in the uncontracted form which theoretically would be aarocayi.msu (aaroce.msu) per Geiger 168.4 and 159 re: Class IV verbs, but I have never seen it,
Metta, Bryan
--- On Sun, 4/10/11, Noah Yuttadhammo <yuttadhammo@...> wrote:
From: Noah Yuttadhammo <yuttadhammo@...>
Subject: [palistudy] ārocesu
To: "palistudy@yahoogroups.com" <palistudy@yahoogroups.com>
Received: Sunday, April 10, 2011, 9:07 AM
Dear Friends,
Can anyone tell me anything about the following sentence:
"Atha kho te bhikkhū bhagavato etamatthaṃ ārocesu."
other than that it is a typographic error? I'm about to submit a report
to the VRI telling them their file:
http://www.tipitaka.org/romn/cscd/vin01m.mul4.xml
has the above typo in it. There are 98 instances of the sentence "Atha
kho te bhikkhū bhagavato etamatthaṃ ārocesu." in the Vinaya Pitaka, and
the 97 other instances all have "Atha kho te bhikkhū bhagavato
etamatthaṃ ārocesuṃ."
Best wishes,
Yuttadhammo
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]