mudhappasanna

Dear Friends,

Just wondering if anyone can clear up this compound, from the Vinitavatthu
of the first Parajika, for me... it was pointd out to me that the PTS has
buddhappasanna, and I notice that the Sri Lankan Tipitaka has
muddhappasanna.  The version I am using is based on the VRI Tipitaka, which
has mudhappasanna.  I am wondering whether anyone could verify for me
whether the Burmese tipitaka really does have mudha, or if it is a mistake
in the VRI tipitaka, and whether there are any thoughts on which reading
should be considered correct.

Thanks in advance,

Yuttadhammo


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]