Re: Scholarly appraisal of the Indian edition?

Hi Jim,

For me, the really bad new is this:

> It is based mostly on the Burmese
> Chatthasangayana edition ...

I was hoping that it would have LESS "Burmese influence" than the
other editions, and therefore be better suited to comparative
readings, etc. etc.

> J. Kashyap knew Kaccaayana's
> grammar by heart and even published an Indian edition of this work.

Yes, "in those days" there were Pali scholars in India.

E.M.