Vism passage

From: Ole Holten Pind
Message: 2409
Date: 2008-05-21

to Bhikkhu Nyanatusita, Jim and Lance,

I think the interpretation of the passage on p. 30 pivots on ca like the
similar passage on p. 16, although it is syntactically much clearer than the
former version. ca connects the imesa.m channa.m sikkhaapadaana.m
viitikkamavasena with imesa.m kuhanaa ... paapadhammaana.m vasena i.e.
viitikkama does not apply to the bad dhammas. Thus they seem to be treated
as different.

Ole



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Previous message: 2408
Next message: 2410

Contemporaneous posts     all posts