SV: viyoga (Kc 10) --comment

From: Ole Holten Pind
Message: 1973
Date: 2006-07-28



-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: palistudy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:palistudy@yahoogroups.com] På vegne
af Eisel Mazard
Sendt: 28. juli 2006 11:19
Til: palistudy@yahoogroups.com
Emne: Re: [palistudy] viyoga (Kc 10) --comment

> Yes, The real problem of Kacc 10 is the presence of the term
> adho.thitam. It can only denote a consonant that is placed below.

I equivocate on this point.  I do not see that this must definitively be the
true meaning of "adho.thita.m" --although it is a very appealing
explanation.

E.M.

The commentators agree that adho.thitam means assara.m katvaa i.e. a
consonant without its vowel. This describes very well the pratice of writing
a consonant followed by a vowel below the preceding consonant and writing
the vowel after the ligature with the changes necessitated by any given
initial vowel of the following word.

O.P



Previous in thread: 1972
Next in thread: 1974
Previous message: 1972
Next message: 1974

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts