Re: viyoga (Kc 10) --comment
From: Eisel Mazard
Message: 1972
Date: 2006-07-28
> Yes, The real problem of Kacc 10 is the presence of the term adho.thitam. It
> can only denote a consonant that is placed below.
I equivocate on this point. I do not see that this must definitively
be the true meaning of "adho.thita.m" --although it is a very
appealing explanation.
E.M.