Re: Sadd: TOC (tr. 5,6,7)

Hi Nina,

You wrote:

>Normal or original form. Does this make sense?
>You gave as example raajaa, and then in the compund mahaarajo, this is not
>the original form.
>Nina.

Thanks, this is a very interesting suggestion. Since words can also
take different genders and endings at the end of bahuvrihis, there
could really be a use for a distinction like that. I'll keep it in
mind.

Best regards,

/Rett


>
>op 08-09-2004 15:07 schreef rett op rett@...:
>
>>  I'm curious, what exactly is the pakatiruupa? For this paradigm,
>>  whose key example is puriso (person), would the pakatiruupa be
>>  puriso? Or puris- ? Or purisa ? Perhaps pakatiruupa means something
>  > else?