Dear Jim, wonderful you could do some corrections, I felt a bit ashamed to
send you so much at once, but (sort of excuse) thought of India. Meanwhile I
realize that I have learnt a lot from you, even though my study is only of a
beginner. I read more easily, and I noticed that from the interesting texts
sent by Suan. In that text was the vi particle and Tadao's to particle, in
<abhavato>, the ablative. And after such particle studies you remember them
better. I believe in such studies, particles come back all the time. I am
certainly in for more.
Yes, I like it very much to continue the AN I. 53. I shall study your
corrections, many thanks.
Acarasampanno, it seems I corrected that on the computer, just overlooked
maybe.I looked and it is right in my document. Very plausible what you say
about lobha, dosa, moha, later on it is explained: lobha sahagata adiina.m.
In the next par we get the negation, thus the same counts as for lobha,
dosa, moha.
I am also interested in manuscripts now, like Sarah and I remember you
explained one abreviation, but it escaped me. What is Budsir IV, what COD ,
what Chattasangayana?
Best wishes, Nina.