Re: Previous email resent with Velthuis translieration and translati
From: DC Wijeratna Message: 14231 Date: 2009-12-27
Hi Bryan,
Discussion of this type of topic seems to be not encouraged in this group.
Please see a recent e-m by Yong Peng.
What MN 1 says, my understanding, is that for a mere-worldling Nibbana is a mere word. He cannot say anything about it. Just one more point for you to ponder: When you say Nibbana is a dual of samsaara, you assume that you know what Nibbana is?
Bye now with mettaa,
D. G. D. C. Wijeratna
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Previous in thread: 14229 Next in thread: 14236 Previous message: 14230 Next message: 14232