Re: Saddaniiti XXV: 868

Dear Jim,
thank you for the clarification, I have to get used to it. The
example of the presidential address makes it clearer.
Still some trouble with the expression 'subsequent'. and: <"maya.m"
is a later subsequent then "tumhe" and so it would take precedence
over the earlier "tumhe".> This latter part is not so clear, but
again, I have to think it over.
Nina.
Op 12-okt-2009, om 19:47 heeft Jim Anderson het volgende geschreven:

> "tumhe" is the subsequent
> (paro) used in these two examples, but if "aha.m" or "maya.m"
> should be
> among any of the preceding expressions then we have to use "maya.m"
> instead
> of "tumhe". "maya.m" is a later subsequent then "tumhe" and so it
> would take
> precedence over the earlier "tumhe".

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]