Dear friends,

Sa`nkhepato pana duvidhaava naamapaccayo aakhyaatapaccayo caati.
So, from the collection [given above], moreover, [is] the two-fold noun-suffix and verb-suffix.

* duvidhaava = du-vidhaa-eva

Tatraapi aakhyaatapaccayaa duvidhaa vikara.napaccayanovikara.napaccayavasena.
There, the verbal suffixes, two-fold too, [are] through the influence of vikara.na-suffix and non-vikara.na-suffix.

Tattha vikara.napaccayo akaar-aadi-sattarasa-vidho agga-hita-g-gaha.nena pannarasa-vidho ca.
There, the vikara.na-suffix [is] seventeen-fold akaar-and-so-on, and fifteen-fold with the foremost useful taking.

Novikara.napaccayo pana kha cha saadi-neka-vidho.
The non-vikara.na-suffix, however, kha, cha, sa-and-so-on [is] many-fold.

Ye ruupa-nipphattiyaa upakaarakaa attha-visesassa jotakaa vaa ajotakaa vaa lopaniiyaa vaa alopaniiyaa vaa, te saddaa paccayaa.
Those words, which [are] self-expanatory or not self-explanatory or suitable for elision or not suitable for elision, of a variety of meanings, from the effective endings of the form, are suffixes.

* lopaniiya = lumpaniiya?

Pa.ticca kaara.na.m ta.m ta.m, entiiti paccayaatha vaa;
Because each and every action, the suffix now [is] "enti" or;

Pa.ticca saddanipphatti, ito etiiti paccayaa.
Because [of] the word-ending, now "eti" [is] the suffix.


metta,
Yong Peng.


Project page: http://www.tipitaka.net/pali/synthesis/saddaniti.00.cdv