Re: AN2.1.5 Upa~n~naata Sutta (1/1)

Dear Yong Peng, Bhante,

Op 25-nov-2007, om 4:45 heeft Ong Yong Peng het volgende geschreven:

> bhante, thanks for highlighting the bhaava-tadhita formation as the
> difference between appa.tivaanitaa and appa.tivaanii. However, I
> really can't see how appa.tivaanii can be a modifier/qualifier (ie. an
> adjective) of aha.m. Would you kindly clarify with the following
> simplified sentence:
>
> Appa.tivaanii aha.m padahaami.

-------
N:Could it be that appa.tivaanii has the suffix -in and then it
means: having no restriction? Then it would modify the padahaami, the
striving. This is different from PED. I think PED is not correct here.
Nina.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]