From: Piya Tan
Message: 10683
Date: 2006-08-24
> --- dhammanando_bhikkhu <dhammanando@...>Piya Tan
> skrev:
>
> > The immediate
> > rebirth view (nirantaraabhava-vaada) and the
> > intermediate state view
> > (antaraabhava-vaada) are directly oposed to each
> > other
>
> They are directly opposed if generalized. They are
> logically combinable if we suppose that the process
> may be different from case to case.
>
> If this combined possibility is to be regarded as
> Theravada doctrine is, of course, a different matter.
>
> --- Piya Tan <libris@...> skrev:
>
> > Saints clearly pass away and are reborn immediately
> > (of course arhats are not reborn). However, others
> > with less wholesome habitual tendencies will hold on
> > to some familiar thoughts and places.
>
> This could perhaps also be defined as a period in
> petaloka. What would be the difference between a short
> stay there and an "intermediary state"?
>
> > Lastly, I am taking such discussions as speculative
> > as none of us here really have any experience or
> > proof of such things.
>
> Indeed. But I've met some people who can't say what
> will happen to them tomorrow, but who are absolutely
> sure what will happen to them after death.
>
> Or at least they think they are.
>
> Gunnar
>
>
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Paa.li-Parisaa - The Pali Collective
> [Homepage] http://www.tipitaka.net
> [Files] http://www.geocities.com/paligroup/
> [Send Message] pali@yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups members can set their delivery options to daily digest
> or web only.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>