Re: AN1.16.1-94 Ekadhamma (3/11)

From: Ong Yong Peng
Message: 9867
Date: 2006-01-28

Dear Dmytro and friends,

thanks. For the title "ekadhamma", we might have to leave it as "one
dhamma", just as it is proposed by Nina. However, we will still have a
discussion upon the completion of the text. There are eight more weeks
to go.


metta,
Yong Peng.

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Dmytro O. Ivakhnenko wrote:

> Dmytro, by "a wider context", do you mean 'Ekadhamma'?

Yes.

Previous in thread: 9865
Next in thread: 9868
Previous message: 9866
Next message: 9868

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts