Hi Ole and group,

> Dines
>Andersen and Smith were evidently right when they defined anika.t.tha as not
>near, far from (the goal), and the cpd.s with citta as not present with
>one's mind and with kaaya as whose body is not present (scil. in the forest
>mode of life.

This is very interesting, thanks. Is this from Andersen and Smith's unpublished notes for the CPD? Does it say anything about how they reasoned, or what other examples they looked at?

best regards,

/Rett