Dear Alan and friends,

my apologies, it was a slip of the fingers (or the mind?). It should
just be:

ppr: present participle


metta,
Yong Peng.

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Alan McClure wrote:

Thank your for your suggestions. Could you specify for which
examples you feel "ppr" or "present perfect" would be a good fit. My
English grammar in this area is not strong and though I just looked
up the term online, it does not clarify things much for me. As I
understand it, present perfect can designate many things and so might
sometimes be applicable to a few tenses in Pali.

> ppr: present perfect