From: Kumaara Bhikkhu
Message: 7688
Date: 2005-05-28
>II agree.
>suppose if a monk serving as a member of parliament were to
>accept a salary, then he might be censured by the sangha for
>wrong livelihood. Later, heavier sanctions could be applied
>if he did not quit that occupation.
>But what if the monk were to accept no payment for his work?Do you mean to say his is to be considered a kuladussaka?
>In that case, perhaps his role as a public servant might
>give grounds for censure (or worse) for improper association
>with householders.
>Of course this is all pretty theoretical. In practice, IIt's unfortunate indeed. I think it's unlikely that the government would do anything of that sort, since it would certainly anger their supporters. It is best handled by the Sangha itself, but even conscientious monks would not bother to invoke the Vinaya to deal with them accordingly. They are clearly outnumbered and should they try to do anything, they can get themselves into a lot of trouble for little, if any, benefit.
>think the political role of much of the Sinhalese sangha is
>too deeply entrenched to make any such action feasible,
>unless there were some heavy-handed intervention by
>the State.