Dear Dimitri,
thank you for the articles and for the sutta text. I would like to add
something.
Consciousness is the principal, the leader, in cognizing the object, and the
cognizing of consciousness is different from Œperceiving¹ by saññaa which
Œmarks¹ or recognizes the object.
In Vis XIV, 3, perception has been compared to a child that sees a coin
without discretion, and citta has been compared to a villager who knows more
about the characteristics of the coin. Whereas pañña is like a money changer
who knows everything, all details, of the coin.
This simile helps to understand different levels of knowing.
Nina.

op 08-03-2005 08:25 schreef Dmytro A. Ivakhnenko op nibbanka@...:
>
> Vihi.msaasa~n~na is not an inclination - it is apperception preceding
> intention:
>
> ³Vihi.msaadhaatu.m, bhikkhave, pa.ticca uppajjati
> vihi.msaasa~n~naa; vihi.msaasa~n~na.m pa.ticca uppajjati
> vihi.msaasa"nkappo ŠpeŠ vihi.msaachandoŠ vihi.msaapari.laahoŠ
> vihi.msaapariyesanaaŠ vihi.msaapariyesana.m, bhikkhave, pariyesamaano
> assutavaa puthujjano tiihi .thaanehi micchaa pa.tipajjati­ kaayena,
> vaacaaya, manasaa.
>
> SN 2.151
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Dmytro Ivakhnenko
>
>
>