Well, the first part of the message, the part by beh_nar, that you quoted is mostly gibberish. Also, I've read Mr. Nyland's claims before, and I personally believe that they need to be taken with a very, very large grain of salt.
Andy Howey
allingus <allingus@...> wrote:
Any comments on this?
Kamil
--------------------------------------------
----- �zg�n Ileti -----
Kimden: "beh_nar" <beh_nar@...>
Kime: "allingus" <allingus@...>
G�nderme tarihi: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:06 PM
Konu: Re: Fw: Basque the foundation of all on Europe.
asci! Alignus. You are right.
The ABC (abstract language) cann not be created whithout agrement.
It was the grodz infrastructure to make it.
It was developed on the sunset time when the vilo_zowi voted ne v ci
waiting for the barbeque(roz_na). Words logic ixlop prove it.
(i preparing more on it)
The Basque L is directy (no dictionary if you fill it 1.5h) related.
The closest mach are slavic languages (ma zo) which may be the origin.
It is best mach for ixlop and also Basque.
The origin time now i propose move later to ~2k yers
before Black See
flood.
So the origin of ABC level language is slavic (ma zo).
Regards
_.._
Ksuedat Zuscrandeb
If this is ferst note i claim the credits.
--- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "allingus" <allingus@...> wrote:
>
> ----- �zg�n Ileti -----
> Kimden: "Edo Nyland" <edonon@...>
> Kime: <allingus@...>
> G�nderme tarihi: Sunday, August 03, 2003 8:21 AM
> Konu: Basque the foundation of all on Europe.
>
>
> John:
>
> I gave you two references, my book and Colin Renfrew's. One who has
made a
> deep going study of the relationship between Basque and the Slavic
languages
> is Petr Ljandacek: ljandacek@... <mailto:ljandacek@...> (Los
> Alamos, NM) He has long lists of words and expressions which clearly
> indicate a Basque substratum/origin. Another from Germany is in
Spektrum der
> Wissenschaft (German
equivalent to Scient. American) by Dr.
Elisabeth Hamel
> and Dr. Theo Vennemann. Entitled "Die Ursprache der Alteuropaer"
(Vaskonish
> war die Ursprache des Kontinents), May 2002 issue.
>
> You state so definitively that Latin was the source of some English
words,
> not Basque. But where do you think Latin came from? I told you that
all I-E
> languages were invented with the use of Basque and I believe I have
proved
> that in my Ling. Archaeology Book. How come all Egyptian pharaohs'
names, as
> far as 5200 years back, without exception can be translated into
Basque
> sentences if there was no Basque language dictionary? Of course
there was. I
> think you should re-examine all those "facts" that were pumped into
your
> head and are now uttered by you as gospel. We are talking here
about a
> Bronze Age development of incredible importance and all academia is
doing is
>
poo-pooing and ridiculing the idea while refusing to examine the
back-up
> data. One prof here at the U. of Victoria (Canada) told me that I
may be
> right, but he is afraid to examine my ideas because he might have
to learn
> Basque.... He said that what I am doing is destroying the
foundation upon
> which I-E linguistics is based, a total paradigm shift, by changing
from a
> lovely looking tree-like family relationship to a group of totally
invented
> languages without relationships that make much sense. The monks
doing this
> work were extremely professional and creative. Why is it so
surprising that
> no one has ever found the origin of the phantom proto-I-E language,
or any
> inscription in that language. It always harps back to Basque and
defying
> that idea has become the strictly enforced dogma of the linguists.
Look at
> my L.A. book and follow the tutorial. This was
done at the U. of
Wisconsin
> and next October I will be there on a week-long series of lectures.
A long
> review of my two books is to be found in the last issue of the
ASCAP Society
> Volume 4, #2. See pages 28-33 by Dr. Russell Gardner.
> www.theascapsociety.org <http://www.theascapsociety.org>
>
> What does it take to shake those thousands of worried linguists
loose from
> all their R.C. church dictated pre-conceived notions? You are not
the only
> one, they are all the same, especially Larry Trask. I-E Linguistics
is the
> last academic discipline ruled by Rome. It is time that this is
changed.
> Give it a try and the Pope may even apologize for the
incomprehensible mess
> the Benedictine monks made of the Western European languages.
>
> Edo Nyland,
> edonon@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.