From: allingus
Message: 1033
Date: 2003-08-04
--- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "allingus" <allingus@...> wrote:
>
> ----- Özgün Ileti -----
> Kimden: "Edo Nyland" <edonon@...>
> Kime: <allingus@...>
> Gönderme tarihi: Sunday, August 03, 2003 8:21 AM
> Konu: Basque the foundation of all on Europe.
>
>
> John:
>
> I gave you two references, my book and Colin Renfrew's. One who has
made a
> deep going study of the relationship between Basque and the Slavic
languages
> is Petr Ljandacek: ljandacek@... <mailto:ljandacek@...> (Los
> Alamos, NM) He has long lists of words and expressions which clearly
> indicate a Basque substratum/origin. Another from Germany is in
Spektrum der
> Wissenschaft (German equivalent to Scient. American) by Dr.
Elisabeth Hamel
> and Dr. Theo Vennemann. Entitled "Die Ursprache der Alteuropaer"
(Vaskonish
> war die Ursprache des Kontinents), May 2002 issue.
>
> You state so definitively that Latin was the source of some English
words,
> not Basque. But where do you think Latin came from? I told you that
all I-E
> languages were invented with the use of Basque and I believe I have
proved
> that in my Ling. Archaeology Book. How come all Egyptian pharaohs'
names, as
> far as 5200 years back, without exception can be translated into
Basque
> sentences if there was no Basque language dictionary? Of course
there was. I
> think you should re-examine all those "facts" that were pumped into
your
> head and are now uttered by you as gospel. We are talking here
about a
> Bronze Age development of incredible importance and all academia is
doing is
> poo-pooing and ridiculing the idea while refusing to examine the
back-up
> data. One prof here at the U. of Victoria (Canada) told me that I
may be
> right, but he is afraid to examine my ideas because he might have
to learn
> Basque.... He said that what I am doing is destroying the
foundation upon
> which I-E linguistics is based, a total paradigm shift, by changing
from a
> lovely looking tree-like family relationship to a group of totally
invented
> languages without relationships that make much sense. The monks
doing this
> work were extremely professional and creative. Why is it so
surprising that
> no one has ever found the origin of the phantom proto-I-E language,
or any
> inscription in that language. It always harps back to Basque and
defying
> that idea has become the strictly enforced dogma of the linguists.
Look at
> my L.A. book and follow the tutorial. This was done at the U. of
Wisconsin
> and next October I will be there on a week-long series of lectures.
A long
> review of my two books is to be found in the last issue of the
ASCAP Society
> Volume 4, #2. See pages 28-33 by Dr. Russell Gardner.
> www.theascapsociety.org <http://www.theascapsociety.org>
>
> What does it take to shake those thousands of worried linguists
loose from
> all their R.C. church dictated pre-conceived notions? You are not
the only
> one, they are all the same, especially Larry Trask. I-E Linguistics
is the
> last academic discipline ruled by Rome. It is time that this is
changed.
> Give it a try and the Pope may even apologize for the
incomprehensible mess
> the Benedictine monks made of the Western European languages.
>
> Edo Nyland,
> edonon@...