isnt it show that word A is a comosition of words B
A> > adunamentum
B> > a duna men tu
C> > a du na men tu

Mathematicaly
it is a set of elemnts with order.
The logic value of A & B are the same
perhaps if we cat add value to other word list
eg Latin it could ne proved that latin is the
Source.
But WhY add a priori a prefered value? cut(*1)

is it a brain limit? i think 0.4
is it a politics ? i think 0.2
is it a fashion ? i think 0.8
Is it a right ? i think 0

Regards
Slawomir



results

D
ad una mentu 59
adu na mentu 31
adun a mentu 24

also
E
aduna m entu 14
aduna men tu 96
aduna ment u 36

F
G in D ignore mantu
H in F Ignore aduna




and
I ignore John as viceversa

--- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "H.M. Hubey" <hubeyh@...> wrote:
> There is no reason why Latin adun- and Turkic utan cannot be
related. It
> also shows
> up in Turkic as uyal, and ayIp (shameful). Using the usual dh>y,d,
t
> there is no reason
> why they cannot be genetically linked.
>
> But anagrams are a different story.




>
> Similarly the root Kaya uses et (to do) shows up as ep (akkadian),
tu
> (Chuvash) and
> of course, "do" English. Again there is no reason why some words
could
> not have been
> created from a stem/root+do/make. It shows up in Turkic e.g, kork
(to
> fear), korkut (scare,
> eg. cause to fear).
>
> slawomirmiroslawski wrote:
>
> > --- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "slawomirmiroslawski"
> > <slawomirmiroslawski@...> wrote:
> > > Using the word list from ixlop i my soft arange:
> > >
> >
> > the arngament take some time, but this is under construction sof
> >
> > > a stream of some kind of liquid or gas coming in speaker
direction
> > > a stream of some kind "anything" coming in speaker
direction
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> > click here
> >
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=259538.3625325.4914071.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17
05739206:HM/A=1695348/R=0/SIG=11u38u3s2/*http://hits.411web.com/cgi-
bin/hit?page=1374-105951838331032>
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> --
> Mark Hubey
> hubeyh@...
> http://www.csam.montclair.edu/~hubey

ad--1
Whay look at a set of sets when i showing simpler set.

Why some words sets may be prefered
And other just ignored?

Du the linguist just like
Some languages ?

Or do they use only a limited set du tu human capacity?