--- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "Gerry" <waluk@...> wrote:

> --- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "Peter P" <no1@...> wrote:
>
> > Gee, I don't understand the problem. I can't think of anything
> that
> > is more pertinent to a Nostratic list than a knowledgeable
> discussion
> > of Proto Uralic. I for one hope the discussion continues. If

not

> > here than at Nostratic-L. Peter P
>
> Proto Uralic is very important. Decide which group you wish to

join,

> Peter. Read the group discussion.
>
> Gerry

Personally I am interested in reading about the linguistic
connections between PU, PIE, and other members of the Nostratic
(super)family of languages. I find it more meaningful if the
discussion is based on sane logic and accepted linguistic
principles. To that end I was hoping to be welcome here and at
Nostratic-L also. But Gerry you make it sound as if I have to decide
either, or. Surely this is not your intention?

You are right about the group discussion. There is none at Nostratic-
L. I guess Andy should place a welcome message. Someone has to post
first and the most appropriate person is the owner of the list.

Peter P