Well, I have read all new messages and I have many
problems in order to understand them. For example, I
have read the whole Miguel Carrasquer Vidal's personal
page and I think that I have a very important
question: where is "Pre-Proto-Indo-European
Phonology"?. This section is necessary to be able to
understand the rest of morphological changes and
evolution (how can you make the morphological section
without a clear phonological system??).

In adittion to this, many of the changes that he
proposes are typologicaly incorrect or very, very
strange (tw- > sw-, -tw > -sw, -tw- > -t(w)-??, swVsw

> usw, how it is possible?).

I can not also understand why all people think that
the laryngeals were originally consonants (*k???). It
is very important to read Reynolds et alii
"Proto-Indo-European Laryngeals were vocalic",
Diachronica XVII(2), 2000. It is not a definitive in
the topic, but it must be read. Besides it, is more
plausible that *H = *x.

I only say that is necessary more comparative
evidence, and not is necessary hypothesis in the air.
I think that MCV or GG are very clever persons.

JAAF

_______________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger
Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis!
Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es