From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 426
Date: 2001-11-24
>There is perhaps a misunderstanding her: I do not claim that theI call that end-stress.
>thematic wovel arose from nouns with end-stress.
>
>What I think is that the roots were disyllabic, ending in a wovel.
>Some of these I think had the stress fixed on the second wovel (what
>I called the end root-wovel). This wovel was protected by its stress,
>and gave rise to the thematic wovel.
>Your example (*ph2tér-s, *ph2tr-ós) is in exxelent concordance with[There was a vowel between *p and *h2].
>my hypotesis, not as an example of a later thematic noun, but an
>athematic.
>
>This noun I think originally had the stress on the penultimate
>syllable. When considering that the genitive ending originally was
>syllabic, originating from the Steppe ablative-ending -ta, the
>development of this noun, according to my hypotesis is exactly what
>you find in reality:
>
>Nom ph2te`ros > ph2te`rs
>Gen pht2tero`se > pht2ero`s