Perhaps Glenny if you had published something you might be less bent
out of shape when someone offers any type of criticism (all be it a
gentle crit). Your thoughts are open for the taking but definitely
not available for discussion, eah? Actually, it's quite easy to
assume a passive mode and likely that's why you "go irate" with your
off-color terminology.
Now why should I need to come up with a new name to describe a
language family when many of the senior researchers have already
presented several excellent alternatives?
Nah, I'm not radically trying to redefine established terminology.
Only trying to pull it all together.
Gerry
Previous in thread: 363 Next in thread: 367 Previous message: 364 Next message: 366