From: Patricia
Message: 4949
Date: 2005-03-08
May I add a comment to this please Haukur,This is just as I feel it might be, - a sort of "heart reaction" -Litli Broðir minn - could be a loving way of an older Brother to a younger, in a very possessive way of speaking perhaps justifying the minn because "he's mine and dear to me"Broðir minn litli yes it would be contrived I see that, but they had large families inn those days, and this form could be valid if it was the persons youngest (whether little or not) brother being referred to, unless there is a better way of expressing it, like the English phrase my younger or indeed youngest brother. (it sounds patronizing)I tend with my Grandmother's influence to use old forms of speech, and because of her influence I am resistant to changing, and I understand when older people than am I, also have a tendency to use the old forms and dialectsThey try to root out this "inferior" declension in the
schools and I think now it may mostly be heard from older
people = You have said Haukur =and that I can understand, maybe I should go live in Iceland, I could come to terms with the language and the fondness of the older folk for the old forms of speech - for the reason that my Grandmother was brought up by her greatgrandmother, I even find today with amusement the modern forms of speech elusive, and that is in English included.KveðjaPatricia----- Original Message -----From: Haukur ÞorgeirssonSent: Monday, March 07, 2005 10:58 PMSubject: Re: [norse_course] Re: "Little Brother?"> The forms 'minn kæri (faðir/bróðir)' "my dear (father/brother)"
> suggest that 'minn litli bróðir' might be acceptable after all.
The normal modern address is: "Litli bróðir!"
I suppose you *could* say: "Litli bróðir minn!"
But I'm not sure why the 'minn' is needed.
A concocted Old Norse form might be:
"Bróðir (minn) inn litli!" but I don't
recall seeing that anywhere.
Incidentally the use of weak adjectives with
nouns without article sort of creates a vocative
case in modern Icelandic.
Without article the words are declined like this:
nom. lítill bróðir litlir bræður
acc. lítinn bróður litla bræður
dat. litlum bróður litlum bræðrum
gen. lítils bróður lítilla bræðra
With the article the words are declined like this:
nom. litli bróðirinn litlu bræðurnir
acc. litla bróðurinn litlu bræðurna
dat. litla bróðurnum litlu bræðrunum
gen. litla bróðursins litlu bræðranna
But then we get:
voc. litli bróðir! litlu bræður!
And there is no word like 'sá' or 'þessi' to
turn the adjective weak.
Also incidentally I hadn't realized what an excellent
exercise declining "litíll bróðir" is. Several cute
little irregularities in both words :)
And on the subject of 'bróðir' I might mention that
some people use the same form (bróðir) for all cases
of the singular (same with 'dóttir' and 'systir').
They try to root out this "inferior" declension in the
schools and I think now it may mostly be heard from older
people.
Kveðja,
Haukur
A Norse funny farm, overrun by smart people.
Homepage: http://www.hi.is/~haukurth/norse/
To escape from this funny farm try rattling off an e-mail to:
norse_course-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com