From: Joao S. Lopes
Message: 71753
Date: 2014-07-02
containing the /o/-grade of the root> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "dgkilday57" <dgkilday57@...> wrote:
>
> On second thought, if <Ro:ma> is derived from *reuH- 'to spread out,
> make room' (as in Lat. <ru:s> 'countryside' from *rewHos 'expanse,
> spread', Gmc. *ru:maz 'space, room' from *ruH-mo- 'extended, spread out,
> etc.), it is better to explain the morphology without going outside
> standard Latin.
>
> A plausible parallel is Lat. <po:mum> 'fruit', for which Umb.
> <Puemune> dat. sg. 'to Pomonus' requires an Italic stem *powemo-
> 'fruitful'. This can be taken as
> > That's right. This would mean *sru:ma is either from a different
> > language, possibly Italoid (i.e. your Illyro-Lusitanian), or from early
> > Sabellian before the change sr- > fr-.
>
From a statistical point of view, *sreu-m- can be found in Balto-Slavic, Albanian, Greek, Celtic and Germanic, while *reuH-m- is only found in Germanic. This would imply the former etymology is preferrable, although the loss of *s- should be still accounted for.