From: Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
Message: 71131
Date: 2013-03-29
>(...)
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
> <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@...> wrote:
>>
>> For beccus I had already proposed, following the suggestions by*Bhr.:
>> Delamarre 2003: 70 and 80, a root *bek- (or maybe *gWek-) 'sting',
>> unless *bekko-s < *gWet-ko-s (cf. *gWet- 'bulge', Pokorny 1959: 481).
>
> The obvious problem with *gWet-ko-s is that *-tk- should have undergone
> metathesis outside Anatolian and Tocharian, as in Celtic for 'bear', unless
> we presume that *-ko- remained productively in use with bare roots.
> Connecting 'beak' with 'bee' seems rather fanciful, even if a beak is pointy
> like a sting.
>
>
> DGK