From: Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
Message: 70921
Date: 2013-02-11
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:
>>
>> 2013/2/10, stlatos :
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2013/1/29, stlatos :
>
>> >> > árthron = joint G; vs
>> >> > artus -u:s L; ard -u- = order Ar;
>> >>
>> >> Armenian /rd/ < */rt/
>> >
>> >
>> > Also, though I didn't give this as ev., sometimes rt > rtH in Ar:
>> >
>> > kartH -i- = fish-hook / leg Ar;
>> >
>> > probably rel. to:
>> >
>> > kart-nagl = twisted nail ON;
>> >
>> > so this rd could also be ev. for dH, just less certain than the others
>> > I
>> > gave.
>> >
>> >
>> > The opt. alt. in:
>> >
>> > tarpós = large wicker basket G; tHarpH = large wicker fishing-basket /
>> > creel, tHarb = wicker trellis-work Ar;
>> >
>> > makes it likely there was opt. alt. for all Cr / rC (due to r. > R).
>
>> >
>> Bhr.:
>> 1) all examples are from rC, not Cr
>
>
> Do you mean for Ar? Then:
>
> astr \ azdr = thigh / shoulder(-blade) Ar;
>
> which shows the opt. itself.
>
>
> Other ex. of opt. for Ar are hard to find since Cr > rC in many words:
>
> surb = sacred / pure Ar; çubhrá- \ çubhrí- = shining / beautiful RV S;
>
> besides complex changes in clusters:
>
> ostrús = hop hornbeam G;
> ortH Ar; hardhi = grapevine Al;
>
> skór(o)don G; hurdhë Al; *kHsort > xstor -i- = garlic Ar;
>
>
> The opt. (s)tr > r(s)t > rt / etc. seen in ortH is sim. to opt. st > ts (
>> c ) and rs > rts ( > rc ) , etc.:
>
> brjóst ON; bréost OE; breast E;
> brusts Go; brust OHG; *rbust > erbuc = breast of animals Ar;
>
> Tuisco \ Tuisto = (Ymir ?)
> twisk = twofold OSx; zwisk = twofold / double OHG;
> dvis.t.ha- = ambiguous S; erkicH-s = twice/again Ar;
>
> túrsis \ túrris = tower G; turid = tower/pillar, tor EIr; tor \ torr =
> tower/castle/crest Ir; tòrr = conical hill Ga;
> *túrs- > tHurc = cheek, tHus^ -a- = cheek, tHuR = swelling Ar;
>
> (compare rs. in:
> tHars^amim \ tHaRamim = wither Ar; tHrus.nì = thirst(y) Khow;
> )
>
> in which r.s > r.s. with opt. s. > s^ (or sim.).
>
>
> The opt. (s)k / kHs / x(s) / etc. of *kHsort > xstor is also seen in:
>
> sceolh = crooked OE; scelus = evil deed / crime L; skoliós = c, skellós =
> c-legged G;
> kaL = lame, xeL = mutilated / lame, s^eL = slanting / crooked, s^eLim = go
> astray, s^aLim = be mistaken/confused, sxal = mistake/failure/crime Ar;
>
> in which ks > ks. with opt. s. > s^ (or sim.).
>
>
> Not only opt. kH > x but pH > f ( > xW > w / h ) :
>
> septem L; secht+N OIr; ewtHn Ar;
>
> pedica = fetter L; fetel = belt, feter = shackle OE; fetter E; pHiwlake: =
> prison Ar;
>
> pay = foot(step) / track P; >> anpHayi -ea- \ amayi -ea- =
> uninhabited/desert/untrodden Ar;
>
> with nxW > nw > mw > m .
>
>
> The dia. Iran. kY > cY > sY > T shows that TY was dental, and in Ar opt.
> dental s() > T > f ( > xW > w ) in:
>
> * gYnòxWskY- > c^anac^Hem Ar;
> * -ti- > canawtH -i- = an acquaintance Ar;
>
> and (with rare tH > s):
>
> * plekYtí+s > hiws -i- = plait Ar;
> hiwsem = weave/plait Ar; lüsil (inf) = w/p Lar; fsEl Nor; NAr;
>
> (compare pl > l / p ( > pH > f > xW ) in:
> fealh OE; felly \ felloe E; xecH \ hecH = felloe Ar;
>
>
>> 2) C is voiceless, epenthetic /d/ is voiced
>
>
> Which? If ánthro:pos, then, as I've said before:
>
> C > (+v) (+H) / _R
>
> or opp.
>
>
> Ex. w rk / rg include:
>
> morc^ \ morc^H = young branch / stick Ar;
> * mUrky: > mrkva SC; morkóv' = carrot R;
>
> while another word for 'hornbeam' shows kr. > gR in the opp. group:
>
> hornbeam E; carpinus L; grab R; skrúoblas Lith;
>
>
>> 3) /r/ in anthro:pos isn't from */r./,
>
>
> How do you know?
>
>
> otherwise:
>> a) either *h2nr-h3kw-o-s would have /r./ > /rV/ in Mycenaean time (or
>> later) and then no more treatment of epenthetic /d/ (/in /nr/) as in
>> 'Graeco-Armenian'
>> b) or it would have it earlier, but then the difference from *h2nr-os
>> > andros would require an explication that Your doctrine of optional
>> alternations is intrinsically incapable of formulating (it seems You
>> don't realize every example You give is by itself a falsification of
>> such an explanation)
>
>
> That makes no sense.
>
>
>