From: stlatos
Message: 70838
Date: 2013-01-30
>So the dif. between:
> 2013/1/29, stlatos :
> >
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:
> >>
> >> Since the obvious epenthetical plosive is voiced /d/, I fail to
> >> understand
> >> how could it be that we get a voiceless aspirate unless through a sort of
> >> double sound shift by which one would expect at least /ph/ if not
> >> anything
> >> more instead of /p/ of -pos
> >
> >
> > There are many words showing t/dH alt. before r:
> >
> >
> > vártra-m S; vart = shield Os; vs
> > várdhra-s = strap/girdle/belt S;
>
> two suffixes; if they have common origin, it's */th/, not */d/
>
> >I took care to separate those showing t from dH; the lower line has artus & ard, vs the upper line with -th-.
> > árthron = joint G; vs
> > artus -u:s L; ard -u- = order Ar;
>
> Armenian /rd/ < */rt/
>So, if:
> >
> > tetró:konta Dor G; cethorcho OI; vs
> > quadrá:ginta: L; kHaRasun = 40 Ar;
>
> This isn't before */r/ because there's */w/ between */t/ and */r/
>
> >No way.
> > dragan OE; draw E; vs
> > trahere L;
>
> Different roots
> they can be the same before PIE, just like English foot and pedestrianNo way.
> aren't transformation of the same synchronically underlying form
>
> >
> > þragjan = run Go; vs
> > trékho: () threkso: (fut) = run G; dredh = turn/twist/revolve Al; daRnam =
> > (re)turn Ar;
>
> Different roots
>Everyone without something against optionality or a crazy theory can tell they're from the same root.
> >
> > ané:r andrós (g) anéres (p) G; vs
> > ánthro:pos G; [analogy as if an- = not/bad ?] dró:ps Mac;
>
> This was the demonstrandum
>