From: Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
Message: 70833
Date: 2013-01-29
I've always considered the possibility of a dialectal or substratal shift *nr>*nTr in anthropos, relating it to aner, andros.Why would kH- > (instead of gH- > ) in:
kharopós \ kharo:pós = fierce G; kháro:n = lion Mac;
> therefore no need for "opt." (ánthro:pos <
> *h2endH-ro-h3kW-o-s has no connection with dró:ps)
and how could this not be < andr- anér- ?
JS Lopes