From: Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
Message: 70819
Date: 2013-01-28
>"Locative I", cf. Metka Furlan, "Hethitische Direktivendung -a(:) und
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:
>>
>> (Non-Unicode transliteration: *dHlh2nk(')ih2 > th'alassa vs.
>> *dHlh2enk(')h2-eh2 > dalagkha:)
>
>
> Then where does this second h2 come from if the only dif. is which fem.
> ending was added?
>kháro:n isn't Macedonian, to my (limited) knowledge
>
>> kháro:n, leíbe:thron, arphús can (leíbe:thron does) have voiceless
>> */-kH-/, */-tH-/, */-pH-/,
>
>
> Why would kH- > (instead of gH- > ) in:
>
> kharopós \ kharo:pós = fierce G; kháro:n = lion Mac;
>Which one? ánthro:pos can't because of /th/, dró:ps can't because
>> therefore no need for "opt." (ánthro:pos <
>> *h2endH-ro-h3kW-o-s has no connection with dró:ps)
>
> and how could this not be < andr- anér- ?
>
>
>>
>>
>> 2013/1/27, stlatos :
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It should be *dÊ°lhâ‚‚nk⠽’⠾ihâ‚‚ > thálassa vs. *dÊ°lhâ‚‚enkâ
>> >> ½â€™â
>> >> ¾hâ‚‚-ehâ‚‚ > dalagkhÄ
>> >
>> >
>> > I can't tell what you're writing thanks to the "update" from
>> > yahoo.com,
>> > but if you're questioning why no kH > g in Mac, you should know that in
>> > add.
>> > to:
>> >
>> > thálassa = sea G; dalágkhan (a) Mac;
>> >
>> > Mac shows Ch in words like:
>> >
>> > kháro:n, leíbe:thron, arphús, etc.
>> >
>> > making it likely that dH > tH > T ( > D [opt.) in Mac, with many
>> > details
>> > (including transcription) uncertain.
>> >
>> >
>> > There are a few more with uncertain corr.:
>> >
>> > ánthro:pos G; dró:ps Mac;
>> >
>> > áliza = white poplar Mac; alphinia Thes G;
>> >
>
>
>