Re: Basque onddo

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@...> wrote:

>
> First /ks/ > /ss/ (cf. essayer), then /ssy/ > <iss> (missionare > moissoner).
> Approcher is REGULARLY from appropiare, I can't understand Your need
> of a different explanation

If, as you said, kty was dif. than the sum of kt > it then ity > , etc., there's no reason to simply assume the above.

>
> 2012/11/5, stlatos <sean@...>:
> >
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
> > <bhrihstlobhrouzghdhroy@> wrote:
> >>
> >> By the way, *approxia:re would yield *approisser in French and
> >> *approsciare
> >> in Tuscan; so *appropiare is compelling
> >
> >
> > What other words show ksy ? You said that kty was dif. than kt, so why
> > would I assume I had to have *approisser? I assume that py > py / pyy in
> > most It., as most Cy, as in proppio , cappio .
> >
> >
> >> 2012/11/1 stlatos <sean@>
> >>
> >> approxia:re
> >> approksya:re
> >> approkYsya:re
> >> approkYsYya:re
> >> approkYxYya:re
> >> approkYkYya:re
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > approcciare It; aprochier OFr; >> approach E;
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>