Re: Semantics of Indo-Aryan Controversy -- Dr. Nicholas Kazanas' Art

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Francesco Brighenti" <frabrig@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "S. Kalyanaraman" <kalyan97@> wrote:
>
> > Semantics of Indo-Aryan Controversy -- Dr. Nicholas Kazanas'
> > Article, comments and response (July 2012)
> > http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.in/2012/07/semantics-of-indo-aryan-controversy-dr.html>
> >
> > 'Semantics of the Indoaryan Controversy' by Dr. Nicholas Kazanas
> > has been published by the Journal *Quaderni di Semantica* (July,
> > 1/2012, vol 65). In the same issue are published Comments by X.
> > Ballester, K. Elst and Rosa Ronzitti and the response by Kazanas.
>
>
> Note, however, there is no commentary by a mainstream Indo-European
> linguist on this paper of Kazanas'. Indeed, both Ballester and
> Ronzitti, although their credentials as Indo-European linguists
> look impeccable, are associated to Mario Alinei's group, while
> Elst, just like Kazanas, is an Out-of-India theorist.

Moreover, even Prof. Jamison's review of Bryant & Patton's 2005 volume, of which Kazanas' _Quaderni di semantica_ article is a rejoinder, is not included in Kalyanaraman's webpage. Why so? The text of Jamison's review is freely available online:

http://www.safarmer.com/Indo-Eurasian/Bryant_Patton.review.pdf

For completeness of information, a link to it ought to be added to that Kalyanaramanesque webpage...

FB