Re: Celtic Ligurian? (was: Ligurian)

2012/6/1, Brian M. Scott <bm.brian@...>:

> At 7:09:19 PM on Thursday, May 31, 2012,
> Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:
>
>> 2012/5/24, Brian M. Scott <bm.brian@...>:
>
>>> At 6:10:40 PM on Saturday, May 19, 2012,
>>> Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:
>
>>>> Also marg f., an alleged Scandinavism (mǫrk), but -g can
>>>> at least suggest Urverwandtschaft
>
>>> Though it's worth noting that DIL also has a citation <co
>>> Temraig Mairci>, with <c>. For that matter, <Hákon> appears
>>> in the Annals of Ulster (AU 847.4) as <Agonn> and in the
>>> Chronicum Scotorum (CS 847.3) as <Agond>.
>
>> Bhrihskwobhloukstroy: that would be the ON loanform
>
> Yes, that's my point: these instances show that the <-g> of
> <marg> doesn't suggest much of anything.
>
> Brian
>
>

Bhrihskwobhloukstroy:
"can at least suggest" is anyway a possibility just like scribal
confusion (at least like that)...