From: Tavi
Message: 69280
Date: 2012-04-09
>I know you quoted E-M's, and despite its age, I think it's a far better work than De Vaan's.
> > That's right, but please notice servus has nothing to do with
> > servo: 'to watch', in spite of De Vaan conflating both words. His
> > dictionary is a rather mediocre work, unworthy of its monetary
> > price.
>
> Yes, you keep saying that. I am not quoting de Vaan, on servus and servare I'm quoting Ernout-Meillet. The attempted connection between seruus and seruare apparently goes back at least to Justinian.
>