From: Tavi
Message: 69145
Date: 2012-03-31
>than
> > I don't think substrate items and data from language families other
> > IE are "imaginary".I regard Vasco-Caucasian as a *real* macro-family or phylum.
>
> Some of those alleged families are imaginary in the first place.
>
> I am familiar with a lot of comparative work on families other thanIE. The
> affiliation of the languages you compare does not matter. What mattersI'm always open to *constructive* criticisms.
> is the methodological standards of your comparison.
>