From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 69138
Date: 2012-03-31
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"Do some basic reading in the field. Even the WP article
> <bm.brian@...> wrote:
>>> my guess is it was borrowed into P-Celtic *pant- and
>>> Q-Celtic (Goidelic) *kWant-. Of course, the time of
>>> borrowing must postdate Common Celtic, which it already
>>> had *bando-/*bendo- 'peak top'.
>> Like many others, I'm not convinced that P-Celtic and
>> Q-Celtic are genuine subfamilies.
> Why so?