From: Tavi
Message: 68820
Date: 2012-03-07
>feature?
> > You don't accept [± spread glottis] as a valid distinctive
> > So how would you like to encode breathy voice in phonological terms?Of course, I was referring to the phonetical representation.
>
> Alhtough I won't reconstruct them for PIE, I think IE-ists should at
> least use IPA standard symbols (a superscript [h\]).
>