From: Tavi
Message: 68804
Date: 2012-03-06
>languages
> > I strongly disagree. Grassmann's Law only applies to those IE
> > which have true aspirated stops in series III, so IMHO there's noother
> > justification for reconstructing a "voiced aspirated" (or whatever
> > name you choose) series in PIE.So
>
> You don't accept [± spread glottis] as a valid distinctive feature?
> how would you like to encode breathy voice in phonological terms?Alhtough I won't reconstruct them for PIE, I think IE-ists should at
>